Dictionary of “liberal” terms

©ktol

Reproduction by permission

and only with attribution

Rush Limbaugh

On this page we will list the words and terms “liberals” use during their tireless march to undermine our freedom, our way of life and western civilization in general. Some of these terms, simple words having hidden meanings, or given new meanings, and drilled into our minds by “educators” and by the biased press, have become so commonplace that we use them ourselves. This way we become unwilling participants in their schemes. Don’t use them! Use the correct word and repeat it in their face, so they’ll understand that you know what they’re up to. Only by standing up to them, in matters big and small, will we be able to drive them back where they came from and where they belong: at the fringes of society, without the power to do any more damage. From there they can rant and rave, spew their venom only amongst their kind, just like the Nazis with whom they are so closely related. But just like many other society ills, “liberalism”, basically a mental disease and almost a religion for some troubled minds, will always exist and always threaten our freedom. Be vigilant – starting with your words!

The term “liberal” is at the head of the list, just to make it clear, otherwise it’ll always be in quotation marks – there’s nothing “liberal” about them. The rest are in alphabetical order. Each entry is followed by an explanation and by our occasional and well-deserved snide remarks. Enjoy!

_______ _* _______

Their Word or Term:	Liberal (AKA “Progressive”)
Meaning:	Socialist (or: Socio-Communist)
We Should Use:	Socialist, like calling a spade: A Spade

Joe McCarthy had it right! In their quest to establish a “fifth column” in the USA, the bastion of freedom and greatest threat to the plans of international communists (ComIntern – check your dictionary under: Third International) the mostly Soviet (read: Russian) operatives have discovered the socialistic tendencies of the most liberal amongst the Democratic party. While “socialism” may have sounded acceptable to some diseased minds, most folks would have given it the well-deserved heave-ho. But the communists are not picky about words if their cause is served, so “liberal” became the substitute word, later attempts to further hide it by changing it to “progressive” did not work either, although the word is still used and appreciated by the elite socialists in places like Berkeley and Santa Cruz in California and Boulder in Colorado. We’ll stop here, although volumes can be written about the unholy alliance between American citizens and persons and causes contrary to our interests, to our rights and freedoms, to our Constitution and Bill of Rights, indeed a danger to our very lives.

* For those not sure of the meaning of the term “socialist”, see definition further down – it’s important.

Their Word or Term:	African-American
Meaning:	Black (as a race)
We Should Use:	Black, but read below

Every individual has the right to be called whatever he or she wants to be called, providing the name or definition is not offensive or injurious to others. Although “American of African Descent” would be both more accurate and respectful of their own citizenship. “African-American” is another politically correct “word” spread by the “liberals” in order to deepen the division between, primarily, blacks and whites. It worked well. It rolls with relish off the tongues of the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, mixed with their particular brand of venom and resonates well with dissatisfied blacks who are told over and over the old lie that the reason they don’t succeed is that our society considers them second-class citizens. So, as a reaction, they further alienate themselves from the mainstream, giving the “liberals” a captive audience and (almost) solid voting block. Back to the name itself, you should call “African-American” any black or group of blacks who insists on it, but when referring to the blacks as part of the population of the United States of America, until black voters will get together and hold a referendum or elect a king who will decree that they should be called something else, call them blacks. Most of them, their parents and grandparents have never seen Africa, the ones who know the realities of the Black Continent wouldn’t touch it with a ten-foot pole, very many resent using a hyphenated name, “Black” is not a derogatory name, the Blacks themselves insisted on being called “Blacks” when the word “Negro” was distorted into a slur and besides, as the saying goes: “Black is Beautiful”

Their Word or Term:	Campaign Finance Reform
Meaning:	No More Free Speech
We Should Use:	Incumbents Protection Act

More on this later, since the dust is far from settling in this issue. From all the good it does by limiting some contributions, it doesn’t stop the incumbents from spending their already accumulated obscene amounts of money and, in addition, muzzles the opposition totally for 60 days prior to an election, so the incumbents, again, can have a field day with our rights and no one will know! We say NO to this scam, but read more about it here, later.

Their Word or Term:	“Environmentalist”
Meaning:	Liberal (refer to definition above)
We Should Use:	Socialist (description - further down)

Another one of many heads of the “liberal” hydra. The so-called “Environmentalists” don’t have anything to do with the environment. Most of them never left their cushy apartments even for a camp-out in the woods. The “environmentalists” I live near are the biggest slobs I’ve seen, incapable of as little as separating the metal from plastic and glass or even rinsing the bottles for recycling. But it’s a scam to make YOU feel guilty for living a decent life and willing to give up more and more of your freedoms. You see, for “liberals” the human condition is a sum-total idea. If there are starving children in Africa it is self evident that it’s a direct result of you, greedy American, eating your juicy steak off your Webber after a hard work’s day! If only you’d renounce your bad ways, consume less and enjoy life less, the rest of the peoples of the world would have more (more of yours, they’ll see to that, I bet) and live better. So “Environmentalism” whether it deals with “saving trees” or with endangered cockroaches or with confiscating private lands or not drilling in the ANWAR to make us independent of the Mid-East oil exporting countries and their gutter regimes, “Environmentalism” has only one aim: to separate us from the good life and the freedom we enjoy. It’s obviously too good, so it must be bad and YOU should feel guilty. Do they really believe all this crap? Some do, some don’t. The ones who do, and who make their religion of it, are good soldiers in the “liberal” army. Useful idiots, as the communists like to call them. The absolute worst are the militant radical ones like Earth First, perpetrators of many sabotages and acts of terrorism. The rest are just using the environmental issues, some real, most imaginary, as a wedge to split our society. Many cases, and we’ll quote some here later, are simply invented and fabricated, some using false evidence, to stop a development or another, usually directed at corporations but with the end result that we all suffer or have to pay more for goods. If you ever meet one, call them to his or her face what they really are: “ENVIRO-NAZIS”.

Their Word or Term:	Gun Safety Laws
Meaning:	Gun Control Laws
We Should Use:	Gun Grabbing Laws

One thing is clear and most “liberals” admit it. Their aim is to confiscate all firearms (meaning all your and my firearms!). That darned Second Amendment is like a thorn in their sides, “our world” would be so much better without guns! How else could they take total control over our land and severely restrict our freedom of movement (for our own good, you understand) when there are so many “gun nuts” out there. Rule of thumb: guns – bad, tofu – good!

So, since there is a while until they can overturn the Second Amendment, the do and end run around it by banning or regulating whatever they can, and can they do because of your apathy! They are either banning or severely restricting guns for reasons having nothing to do with “safety” some are too short, too long, have too many “accessories” caliber is too big, some are outright “ugly” and that’s enough. There are also ways to deal with individuals who become belligerent about it or anything else, their judges can slap a restraining order on such unworthy subjects in less than a minute. Bye bye guns for the unwashed! Another one, also for “safety” reasons, banning firearms from certain areas, and they are many: schools, planes, courtrooms, city halls, any government buildings, who knows what’s next. The noose is tightening. THEY WILL NOT STOP UNTIL THEY GET YOUR LAST GUN OR UNTIL YOU, THE LAW ABIDING CITIZEN, WILL MAKE THEM STOP! Just remember, whether you like guns or not, whether you own guns or not, when our guns are gone – so is the rest of our freedoms. The Second Amendment was put in by the Founding Fathers specifically to help us resist a corrupt, rapacious government and any bunch of hoodlums bent on destroying us, not for plinking and duck-hunting! THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THE TEETH PLACED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES BY THE FOUNDING FATHERS, and “The People” means just that: the people, you and I. It is our duty to be armed AND to know how to defend others and ourselves. Can you imagine the September 11 disaster happening if the pilots and/or some citizens on board would have been armed? We are in this situation today as a direct result of the “liberals” assaults on our freedoms and that’s perfectly OK with them. Better yet, they are using this disaster THEY made possible, to take away even MORE of our freedoms. WAKE UP! Tell the ones who want to get elected, if they are for “gun control”, tell them: “If you don’t trust me with a gun, I don’t trust you with the power of a government position”. It’s that simple.

Their Word or Term:	Progressive
Meaning:	Liberal (refer to definition above)
We Should Use:	Socialist (description - further down)

To be continued … but read about “socialism” further down.

Their Word or Term:	…………..
Meaning:	…………….
We Should Use:	………………..

Their Word or Term:	…………….
Meaning:	………………………
We Should Use:	…………………………

“Socialists” and “Socialism” – Definition, Clarification and More

The dictionary defines a “Socialist” as somebody who adheres to the doctrines of “Socialism”. Here is where the trouble begins. Socialism is defined as a “theory or system of social organization that advocates the control and ownership of industry, capital, land, etc. by the community as a whole”. You guessed it! The Government! The NANNY-STATE! If you doubt for a split second that that’s exactly what your friendly neighborhood “liberal” wants, just take a look. They are working hard to control the Medical Industry (7% of the GNP) and the Pharmaceutical Industry, and that’s just for starters. The schools are already controlled by your 1-800-FederalGovernment, albeit without any Constitutional authority, The Feds control or simply own an ENORMOUS amount of land, and want and get MORE EVERY DAY! I guess the Founding Fathers forgot to put it in writing that the government should NOT own things, especially land! They even tell you how big your john’s flusher should legally be, for God’s sake! And it gets worse: The Marxist definition of Socialism is “the stage following capitalism in the transition of the society to communism”. Is that clear enough for you? That means the Robin Hood-ism will never stop until we finally go (they wish) from: “everybody according to his ability” to ”everybody according to his needs”. Mark these words: If you continue to take it and take it and do nothing about it, one day you’ll wake up to find out that even the land under your own house belongs to the “people” (your government, of course!). And with the land, goes the house! IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE!!! Don’t say: “It won’t happen here”. It’s happening already. Unless you were asleep or on some bad medication you know that many Americans have already seen their land taken over or made unusable by the government to “protect” some snail or frog. Where does it say in the Constitution that the government has the right to do that? Do you believe they’ll stop there? Fat chance! You’re next. There is no one to defend you. The Police and the Military have already been either decimated and/or castrated by the “liberals”. You still have the vote but you have no candidates to vote for. Nobody in her or his right mind will set themselves up as fodder for the wicked mill of lies, innuendo and distortions the “media”, controlled by “liberals” can throw at anybody who threatens their dominance.

NOW – ASK YOURSELF: WHY? Most “liberals are already rich, the ones who aren’t are quickly becoming rich. Why would somebody in his or her right mind, when they own and control so much already, why would they go towards such a proven social and economic disaster? They must be really stupid, mustn’t they? Well, not exactly. Pay attention and keep your eyes on the ball (the money, that is). Power and money are an intrinsic combination. Money buy power, power gets more money. Can’t have one without the other. Anybody with power and money has two choices: hold on to it or lose it! It’s a vicious circle – either get more or start losing it. So the “liberals” having already money and power, aim to keep it and get even more by betting on a few relatively safe things. One is that by pointing to and exaggerating some real and mostly imaginary society ills and setting themselves up as “saviors” (that’s where Robin Hood comes in, they’re “saviors” with YOUR money) they will continue to get elected by an ignorant public who votes with their stomachs and/or their hearts, not their brains. Is that a safe bet? Yes, it is. Nobody has yet gone bankrupt by underestimating the American public. The other major bet the “liberals” count on is that once they get our society in a complete socio-communistic mode, when you’ll loose any progress you and your family has ever made, when we the peons (“Ordinary Americans” as Bill Clinton, Tom Dashle and Dick Gephard call the idiots who keep voting for them) when we become all “equal” (meaning equally poor) that day, they themselves, the “anointed” ones, their families and their friends will continue to be in control forever and ever. Unchallenged. Safe and secure, with all the power, money, privileges and advantages they have now plus much more. Their little petty would-be dictator hearts are beating with anticipation of the day and, guess what? As the cards are stacked now, they’re winning the bet!

Now, is this last bet a safe one? It is safe to say that it will ruin us all, but will it really make all the “liberals” forever powerful? That’s a NO. The bastards don’t count on the nature of the beasts (themselves). Once in total control, without challenge to unite them, they will find “the enemies within”. The power of one will threaten the money of another and vice-versa. Likes and dislikes will exacerbate. The hatred and racism that now fills their hearts will turn them against each other. Heads will roll, some literally. There will be a raise in “heart attacks” “suicides” and fatal “accidents”. Just look at the number of Clinton’s “friends” who died like that in a short 8 years, anybody can tell you that’s a statistical impossibility. Would that make you feel better? I doubt it. Definitely not live better and let’s not forget the threat from all the morons in the world who will see the USA as fair game and ripe for the plucking. Just eight years of Clinton took us to September 11 and don’t doubt it for a minute! When the CIA is busy putting together “diversity” quilts, any moron with a two-bit brain can come over and stage an attack on all of us, especially if he’s crazy enough to commit suicide. If you still doubt for a minute that the “liberals” got us to September 11, read David Horowitz’s well documented article below:

How the Left Undermined America’s Security

Now just think what 20 years of Gore and Gephard and Dashle and Feinstein and Boxer could do to us. So where do we go from here?

You have two choices and doing nothing is not one. That’s because you may “elect” to do nothing but the result is that they continue to win (both the socialists and the terrorists) the deck is already stacked and more poor immigrants are being brought in, legally and mostly illegally, to ensure it stays that way. Remember: for the poor souls coming from the squalor South-of-the border the conditions in a nanny-state would be just about four times as good than the best they ever had. The stomach may be a “poor political advisor” (old Chinese proverb) but a real empty stomach sure is an influential advisor. Just don’t count on them to vote for School Vouchers or for the Right to Work, they may be poor and uneducated but they know exactly which side their bread is buttered. So doing nothing equals letting the “liberals” win. Same as choice number one: vote for them, court them, make sure they know your name, and hope for a “position” in some government bureaucracy when we’ll get to the point when any “private” business will be the exception rather than the rule. Just don’t hold your breath – the “liberals” have no friends, only interests. That leaves you with choice number two: Wake Up! Stop electing them. Stop electing them while you still have the power, and that’s not for too long. Never vote for lawyers, especially liberal lawyers, the most dangerous of them all. You don’t believe it? How else can you explain two two-bit shysters from Arkansas making it to the White House and putting our Great Country through such shame? Or two lousy carpetbaggers becoming both senators of the Great State of California? NEVER vote for carpetbaggers! And shame on the whole state of New York for making Hillary, the carpetbagger extraordinaire, senator! (Still can’t see the two words in the same sentence, “Hillary” and “senator” like there’s a typo somewhere.) Forget the party line and forget voting for the lesser of two evils – vote for the issues. Become an activist. Read on the issues, find out the truth and tell all your friends and relatives. The maximum term a politician can serve should be 8 years. Not a month more! Not a day more! The Founding Fathers didn’t set up a plutocracy but a Government by the People! Let them serve their term and then go back to living their lives as whatever they were before or anything else but government. No exaggerated salaries and pensions, no obscene benefits, they’re citizens like us, not aristocracy. An elected position should be a limited time privilege to serve, not a lifetime racket with family ramifications. Don’t elect their sons or daughters either, not even their grandchildren. Let TWO generations pass in between. These are not things that can be done through laws, just through your common sense and determination. We can clean up the cloaca in DC and places like Sacramento, CA in a matter of 10, 15 years if we stick to it. Find honest, intelligent people and encourage them to run for office. California has 50 million people and ends up with Gray Davis as governor? Tell the “media” to take a hike and get your news and information elsewhere – check out our LINKS page. Also, read Ann Coulter’s book “Treason” which exposes the socialist-democrats for what they are - traitors:

The “media” is not in business to tell the truth or to save the country; they’re in business to make money for their shareholders. To do that they have to protect their interests first, be “politically correct” maintain access to government, etc. In addition 95% of them vote “liberal” (read “democrat” like in “yellow dog democrat”). The “media” are just another card in the liberals’ stacked deck. Most of the time what they are NOT saying is more relevant than what they ARE saying.

The long journey ahead of us, like any journey, starts with a single step. Take that step today! And may God Bless America.

_______ _* _______